Walkers should be made to take a test and have insurance before they are allowed to venture on to Welsh commons, according to one farmer.
Townies should be educated in the ways of the country before being allowed access to the countryside, because of the potential harm they cause to livestock, a meeting of common rights-holders was told.
The Welsh Commons Forum heard that it was becoming more difficult to maintain livestock on the lands because visitors had no understanding of the animals’ natural instincts.
The meeting, held under the auspices of the National Sheep Association, was told the Countryside and Rights of Way Act had placed more of a burden on graziers at a time when stock prices were low and the number of people grazing under common rights had declined.
Reported in the Daily Post newspaper, Neville Powell, chairman of the Black Mountains Graziers Association, said: “Just as people need to be educated before they walk on the roads, they should be educated before they are allowed to have access to the countryside.
“They should not be allowed such access until they’ve passed a test to show they are competent and understand the problems they can create.”
Referring to erosion on the Offa’s Way route, Mr Powell said: “It would make good sense for walkers to pay towards its upkeep, perhaps through insurance. At some stage the farmer has paid for the right to use the common, so why shouldn’t walkers?”
But Kate Ashbrook, general secretary of the Open Spaces Society, which began life in 1865 as the Commons, Open Spaces and Footpaths Preservation Society, said: “Instead of slagging off visitors to the Welsh countryside the farmers and commoners should be welcoming them with open gates.
“While we have little control over the decline in farming, we can have some control over the number of people who visit the Welsh hills and spend money there, staying in farmhouse bed and breakfasts, drinking in local pubs and buying local produce.
“If people are given a warm welcome they might choose to visit Wales‘s spectacular countryside instead of going abroad. And at the same time, the Welsh farmers will have the chance to explain what they do and why we must respect the commons and the grazing they support.
“There have been very few problems generated by the new access rights under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act – but it has created lots of new opportunities to encourage people to enjoy, and to understand, what Wales has to offer.”
Rural affairs minister Elin Jones lauded the contribution the country’s commons made, saying: “Common land is a very important part of the natural and national heritage of Wales, valued for agriculture, recreation, landscape, and nature conservation.
“The graziers amongst us are well aware that the meat produced on our commons is a high quality product. I want Wales to be a country that plays its full part in meeting the challenge of world food security.
“Sustainable livestock farming on common land in Wales will continue to be an essential element in addressing these challenges and maximising the opportunities for Wales.”
David Dear
18 February 2010Fairly typical Plaid Cymru response, little more than Welsh speaking Tories!
David Gibson
18 February 2010Looks like Welsh farmers are doing their bit for Scottish tourism!
rhodesy
18 February 2010What an absolutely ludicrous idea!!!
roworth
18 February 2010Perhaps Welsh farmers should have to take a test and pay insurance before being allowed into towns and cities.
John Neate
18 February 2010It's not April 1 already is it?
Phil Vale
18 February 2010Have a look on Pen y Gwely in N Wales and see all the discarded sheep worming bottles by sheep pens. Discarded by whom? Something about kettles and black!
11amstart
18 February 2010I think the idea is preposterous, but a licence for people venturing onto British mountaineous areas? Mmm, now there's an idea, as it'd save Mountain Rescue time and money! Too many times people are ill-prepared and ill-equipped to be out on the fells.
Fawkirkcraig
18 February 2010Typical Farmer maybe we should have a test for farmers as well
R Webb
19 February 2010Definitely not a typical farmer!
Pathetic little gomls. They already have some pretty disgusting laws protecting their prejudices, yet they want more.
So out of tune with the people I actually meet when walking in Radnorshire.
oneandanother
19 February 2010The "person" suggesting walkers are liceneced is just an idiot to be ignored !!!!!!!!
Jhimmy
19 February 2010To farmers the land is a working environment and home; to the walker it's a play field. What other "industry" can you walk through the factory or office or school and demand that it's your right of access?
Whether you like farmers are not (and some can be right...gomls) the fact remains many have to work very long hours, 7 days a week, 52 weeks of the year and SEE much much more then many of you on your Sunday afternoon stroll.
I'm all for free open access to the hills, but I've seen so much abuse of this privilege I suspect this farmer MAY have a point.
Kinder Kid
22 February 2010I am from a long line of farmers and I am also a keen hill walker, who now lives in town. I am sometimes appalled by the lack of understanding that some friends and fellow walkers have regarding agriculture and particularly livestock. Despite now being definitely a walker first, I would be reluctant to buy land with access across it.
The amount of livestock killed and injured through incidents caused by walkers is very likely to go unrecorded.
Constant sniping from walkers to farmers and vica versa does nothing to improve relations and makes both sides look like numptys!
fluffy bunny
04 March 2010I agree that a farmer's land is a working environment. However, unlike a factory it is subsidised by the tax payer through the single farm payments system. I believe this should be considered by farmers before they are too critical of others enjoying the open land.
Also regarding factories; if a footpath, bridleway or other established right of access passed through it's land the industry would have to accept it.
Responsible and considerate use of open spaces seems to be the key. In reality a test would be an administrative nightmare. Education seems a very reasonable approach together with constructive discussions between all stakeholders.