Campaigners said they are disappointed the national park authority decided not to ban motor vehicles from two unsurfaced lanes in the Lake District.
The authority’s rights of way committee decided to leave Tilberthwaite Road and High Oxen Fell Road as they are, and form a group with interested parties to monitor use of the former and its condition.
The National Trust, Ramblers, Save the Lake District Campaign and Friends of the Lake District pressed the committee to introduce a traffic order that would have prevented recreational 4×4s and trail bikes using the routes, which run between the A593 Coniston road and Little Langdale.
The trust owns land bordering the green lanes, but the Lake District National Park Authority and Cumbria County Council are responsible for the tracks themselves. The authority’s officer recommended against beginning the process to ban motor traffic, and the committee voted in line with his recommendation. About 60 members of the public were present at the meeting on Tuesday.
The park authority said it will now create a partnership management group of invited key partners and stakeholders to work collaboratively to monitor usage and condition, undertaking necessary activities to help mitigate any new issues that may arise on the Tilberthwaite Road, the longer of the two routes which runs from Hodge Close north to Fell Foot in Little Langdale.
It will work with the National Trust to monitor the condition of the track from High Oxen Fell to Hodge Close. It will recommend that the county council maintains the surface in its present condition.
Friends of the Lake District said: “We are very disappointed at this decision.
“The voluntary management approach has been used for a number of years and has, in our view, failed. Both routes are classified as red under the current system which indicates that they are busy and sites where potential conflicts will is likely to occur.
“The park authority has failed to put the conservation of the natural beauty of the area first.”
The National Trust said: “We look after over 20 per cent of the Lake District national park, including land on either side of the unclassified road running between Tilberthwaite Farm and Little Langdale.
“The road itself is the responsibility of Cumbria County Council, and is being looked after by the Lake District National Park Authority on the council’s behalf. We have no authority to control the use of this road.
“We take a wide view – as a major landowner and landlord, a membership and conservation charity and as a key member of the Lake District National Park Partnership.
“We believe that [multi-purpose vehicle] use is damaging and should be regulated by a traffic regulation order at Tilberthwaite and High Oxen Fell.
“We know that opinions differ, and a wide range of evidence is being considered. But we think the report’s recommendations are based on an incomplete understanding of three fundamental principles that lie at the heart of managing the Lake District national park.
“These are: landscape character; the Sandford principle and the outstanding universal value of the world heritage site.
“These principles help national parks find the right balance between conservation and recreation and protect what is important. They are also key to qualifying for a TRO. In particular, we think that the most recent technical expert advice was not followed in carrying out the assessment of the impact on outstanding universal value.
“The Sandford principle says if there is a conflict between protecting the environment and people’s enjoyment of it, that can’t be resolved by management, then protecting the environment is more important.
“Describing these remote valleys as honeypot sites – on a par with Windermere and Bowness, shows a lack of understanding of landscape character.”
The committee also heard submissions in support of continued use of the two routes by motor vehicles from recreational user groups and a commercial 4×4 operator. It also heard from farmers that they are unable to access their land easily or safely and that farming in the area was becoming unviable. Increased use by recreational vehicles, combined with severe weather that had damaged the surface, were cited as reasons for this. The national park authority has recently repaired the Tilberthwaite Road route.
It said: “We have no formally adopted policy or aim with regard to motor vehicular use of unsealed roads.
“In the past we were key partners in the trails management advisory group, and our generally stated view was that while we would prefer recreational green road driving not to take place, we also accept that there is a legal right for this activity taking place on the 120km (approximate) of roads open to them.
“This is about 3.7 per cent of the linear network (3,280km) which is all available to walkers, with smaller percentages open to cyclists and horse-riders. Our view is that it would be unnecessarily discriminatory to arbitrarily ban such legal usage.”
An online petition asking the authority to ban motor vehicles on the route attracted 305,000 supporters while a petition in favour of keeping the routes open to MPVs had 8,500 signatures.
Rod Hepplewhite
11 October 2019A very disappointing but not surprising outcome. However, contrast the stance take by the LDNPA not to protect these non-surfaced green lanes from further erosion by the 4X4 fraternity, against significant opposition, to their decision to surface the repaired Keswick to Railway Trail with a sealed (tarmacadam) surface, again against significant opposition, the objectors preferring the original rolled road-planings/slate chippings and requesting that this be used.
The stance taken by the LDNPA on these two matters seem diametrically opposed to one another (they're happy for the two green lanes to suffer from increasing erosion but insist on tarmac for the Railway Trail footpath/cycelway as it is more resistant to erosion). Unless, of course, their aim is to annoy walkers and cyclists, in which they've succeeded on both.
I despair
Ian
12 October 2019I wonder what these vandals do if walkers organise outings on the tracks and refuse to give way to them on the green lanes?
Potentially dangerous or would it help to solve the problem?
Ian512
13 October 2019For information; https://www.glass-uk.org/
Phil Griffiths
17 October 2019Unfortunately for some the LDNPA have been using empirical data and photographs over a number of years. If they had gone for TRO all that data could be used in a challenge and it would be almost impossible to defend especially combined with the data and evidence of user groups.
Lack of maintenance and water (increasingly so in recent years) are the uncomfortable truths. What's more there some very public examples in the area where roads were downgraded by NERC and so vehicles and their voluntary maintenance groups disappeared from those areas...the results been quite startling levels of deterioration.
Of course so many will read the above and simply think that's not true. But ask yourself on what basis have you made that conclusion? A feeling because you "know that vehicles must make all routes worse in terms of condition" or a long time based trail of evidence?
The LDNPA have to side with empirical evidence otherwise they risk repeating what happened to the YDNPA those years ago
They have to choose data over idealology. Because if you go with idealology and go with the Sandford principle which user group has the biggest negative environmental impact on the area overall?
That's not an answer many would want to touch on.
kirk pearson
17 October 2019please take some time to look at our website, and bear in mind that we [motorised users] have less than 3% of rights of way open to us.
https://allterrainuk.com/
Phil kay
17 October 2019If you ban 4x4 you can not have one rule for one group because you will aft to ban walkers and horses and cycles as well witch is what i would do if i had a chace see if you like. Theres nothing wrong with it as long as you are in proper group club witch as rules witch you after abibe by thanks its called rights for all not one group
John Blackhurst
17 October 2019Well said Phil Griffiths. Couldn't agree more.
Pete
18 October 2019Tracks in the Dales (Mastiles Lane, Fixup Moor, etc) were pretty much destroyed by offroad motoring in the 90s. Since motorised traffic was banned they've grassed over nicely. Enough evidence for ya?
Snowman
18 October 2019Phil Kay - What a load of Twaddle. Of course a particular group can be banned. Learners are banned from motorways. Cars are banned from bus lanes so what is the difference. Also, just because you are in a group does not stop you damaging the track. Indeed it makes it more likely as there will be greater numbers of vehicles passing along the track.
Dean.
03 November 2019It's simple really.
If you have a problem with 4x4s. Walk somewhere else.
Where you can walk far out weighs where you can drive.
These routes are still classified as roads after all.. so the track that's being damaged is an unfinished road.. not a bridleway or footpath that's been illegally driven on.
I've done the routes discussed twice in a 4x4 and have been on plenty of walks in the lakes and frankly there's some far better scenery on routes the 4x4s dont go on.
Do I take it all the people bemoaning pollution and noise ride pushbikes and take trains everywhere?
Dean.
03 November 2019It's simple really.
If you have a problem with 4x4s. Walk somewhere else.
Where you can walk far out weighs where you can drive.
These routes are still classified as roads after all.. so the track that's being damaged is an unfinished road.. not a bridleway or footpath that's been illegally driven on.
I've done the routes discussed twice in a 4x4 and have been on plenty of walks in the lakes and frankly there's some far better scenery on routes the 4x4s dont go on.
Do I take it all the people bemoaning pollution and noise ride pushbikes and take trains everywhere?..
Dean.
04 November 2019It's simple really.
If you have a problem with 4x4s. Walk somewhere else.
Where you can walk far out weighs where you can drive.
These routes are still classified as roads after all.. so the track that's being damaged is an unfinished road.. not a bridleway or footpath that's been illegally driven on.
I've done the routes discussed twice in a 4x4 and have been on plenty of walks in the lakes and frankly there's some far better scenery on routes the 4x4s dont go on.
Do I take it all the people bemoaning pollution and noise ride pushbikes and take trains everywhere?..
.